Comments on: Patrick Cote Vs Ricardo Almeida MMA Video UFC 86

By: mmalove

mmalove — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:40:55 +0000

Cote will get TKO’d the 1st round with Silva just like Irvin….

DON’T YOU EVER GO TOE-2-TOE WITH ANDERSON SILVA!!

– brought to you by Carl’s Jr! Cause I get PAID to say it!

By: Moustachio

Moustachio — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:21:23 +0000

You know, this really wasn’t such a boring fight at all. They aren’t all Griffin-Bonnar, ya know.

By: Costa200

Costa200 — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:27:20 +0000

This was a draw. Third round had no advantage to either fighter…

By: Steamer Bean

Steamer Bean — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:16:31 +0000

Odd stradegy for Cote. In the second round when Almeida was sucking air and had his hands down, Cote was swinging wildly, not really taking time aim, then in the third when Almeida seemed a little more composed, Cote became much more reserved. Patrick didn’t really look tired or anything. I don’t get it….shoulda put him away in the second.

By: Dr.

Dr. — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:21:06 +0000

@ dragoman:

Nice one or “We get bored. We lose.”

(based on Almeida using boredom as the reason for the loss)

By: Dr.

Dr. — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:18:34 +0000

@ Brendan & peter:

1 kick looked a lot more like 4.

And when you’re fighting a top-level BJJ guy and you have a purple belt, you’re at a disadvantage. A purple belt isn’t black, but it’s not shit either. He is a striker, that’s why Almeida was backing up to the cage to negate that. He did a good job but beyond that, his striking was shit. So the same can be said, if Almeida doesn’t get a more rounded game, he won’t be around long.

By: Dr.

Dr. — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:54:22 +0000

I love how Almeida was constantly backing up but then motioning to Cote to come forward. Then he goes on to say that he lost because he was bored in the fight. YOU FUCKING KEPT BACKING UP! And you try to blame the loss on boredom. What a cunt.

By: inferior

inferior — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:52:15 +0000

for those who haven’t realized it yet, Rogan does this in every fight. He will talk mostly about *his* favorite fighter. it’s been the norm for years. Rogan is getting better though, he will throw in some praise to the other fighter as applicable.

By: wiseguy

wiseguy — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:44:33 +0000

fakename is right on the money here… Cote won that fight, but Almeida was inviting him to punch his jaw off the whole time and Cote just didn’t seem to notice. He was not nearly as impressive as he was against McFedries but this is one of his only fights that was not entertaining, and it certainly wasn’t his fault. Almeida did not do anything aggressive the whole fight.

By: palito_lippi

palito_lippi — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:42:50 +0000

i think its a draw…
round 1 10-8 almeida (cote has no strikes at all)
round 2 & 3 10-9 cote

i agree with you guys that UFC (esp. rogan)always praising a fighters like patrick cote, michael bisping, forrest griffin, and momentarily they’ve won the decision… please fix this problem Dana..