10 Responses To This Post
Subsribes to this topic Comment RSS or TrackBack URL
Bolo Says, in 10-30-2011 at 09:39:27 from    


Bolo Says, in 10-30-2011 at 11:08:36 from    

edit, i thought roop was going to win, haha

Lefty Says, in 10-30-2011 at 11:43:18 from    

WTF? Such a crappy decision.

ScrubJONES Says, in 10-30-2011 at 12:47:11 from    

how did u think roop would win hes f****** garbage

MMAGiantSilva Says, in 10-30-2011 at 13:29:36 from    

If Roop is garbage what is Hioki that fight was dead even, infact Roop was much more impressive.

Doyle Brunson Says, in 10-30-2011 at 19:29:45 from    

Roop landed more significant strikes and was more active but hioki had control of the fight for a longer amount of time. Could have gone either way

Dude Says, in 10-30-2011 at 23:51:56 from    

I’m so glad everyone here is educated enough to not scream robbery. Yeah it was a close fight, and yes Roop could’ve and should’ve won, but it was by no means a “robbery.” Hopefully it was jitters that got to Hioki, but damn Roop looked good.

JJ Says, in 10-31-2011 at 05:29:59 from    

idiotic decision. Hioki did aboslutely nothing other then humping Roop for a couple of minutes in the 2nd. Roop did 7 times more damage from the bottom then Hioki from the top. In my book it’s 30-27 Roop. If you’d push very hard and give Japaneese a 2nd for lying on Roop it would still be 29-28 for Roop. Another crappy decision

mmaalldaysmokeherb Says, in 10-31-2011 at 17:13:13 from    

hioki took 1-2…. no way roop would win… only in japan, but not the 10-9 system

tobes Says, in 11-1-2011 at 00:12:43 from    

first round even, split the second and third rounds. i think that there should be more draws in MMA. really not a clear winner in this one


 Username (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (*optional)

Inform me when someone post new message here

Please Note: Comments Moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment