Comments on: Demian Maia vs. Mark Munoz Fight Video UFC 131

By: cms

cms — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 03:11:05 +0000

Agreeing with 29-28 Munoz (2nd and 3rd)
definitely

By: doire1

doire1 — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:47:12 +0000

30 – 27??????
seriously were do they get these f****** judges.

By: noy-pi

noy-pi — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:17:32 +0000

29-28 for munoz. judge “30-27″ sucks

By: zike

zike — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:39:40 +0000

a win is a win guys^_^

By: @MMA

@MMA — Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:22:08 +0000

Maybe the judges saw that the punch that rocked Munoz hit the back of his head (albeit incidentally). Maia definitely won the first round, but couldn’t mount enough significant offense to be given this fight. This was more of a cerebral/chess match fight, and I can appreciate those too. Job well done by both parties. Congrats to @Mark_Munoz.

By: filo561

filo561 — Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:56:16 +0000

f that munoz won rounds 2 and 3.in round 3 he was way aggresive than maia and got a couple of takedowns.in the 2nd round maia was holding on for dear life coz he knows munoz bout to knock his head off

By: lastusername

lastusername — Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:54:37 +0000

the judge that scored it 30-27 should be fired

By: GetSome

GetSome — Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:35:07 +0000

I agree Rio. Sub attempts get no respect by the judges.

By: Rio_warrior

Rio_warrior — Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:37:47 +0000

Probably the judges got impressed by the bullshi* tigh punches munoz threw on the 2rd. The rules on the ufc benefits the wrestlers boring game against the fence and etc. The crucifix attempt was a dangerous move Maia putted on the 3rd and should count a lot on the stupid judges score card. But they saw just 30-27 Munoz. This judges should be judging dancing contests.

By: Philo

Philo — Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:27:37 +0000

alright Bruno theres gotta be someone messin with the posts or sum.. I used no foul language in my last post still get trashed i was just talkin bout the fight.. this driving me crazy brother..